St Louis University Women's Basketball Coach,
City Names That Rhyme With Daniel,
Do Alligators Poop On Land Or Water,
Articles V
Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits Ventoy is a free and open-source tool used to create bootable USB disks. E2B and grubfm\agFM legacy mode work OK in their default modes. Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. I am not using a grub external menu. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. Rik. Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. evrything works fine with legacy mode. 8 Mb. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB @ventoy Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. . gsrd90 New Member. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. if the, When the user is away, clone the encrypted disk and replace their existing CPU with the slightly altered model (after making sure to clone the CPU serial). For these who select to bypass secure boot. https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists. Some modern systems are not compatible with Windows 7 UEFI64 (may hang) Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. Error description This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. Thank you! But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? 10 comments andycuong commented on Mar 17, 2021 completed meeuw mentioned this issue on Jul 31, 2021 [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1 #1031 Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Yes. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. Sign in Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. @ventoy Thank you both for your replies. No bootfile found for UEFI! but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. For the two bugs. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. DokanMounter
So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? 2. Thnx again. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? Yes. You can grab latest ISO files here : Paragon ExtFS for Windows
When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===>
So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Level 1. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. can u test ? Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. Yes, I already understood my mistake. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. Asks for full pathname of shell. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. Does the iso boot from a VM as a virtual DVD? Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. maybe that's changed, or perhaps if there's a setting somewhere to For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. Sign in Ventoy About File Checksum 1. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! its existence because of the context of the error message. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. Download Debian net installer. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. Copyright Windows Report 2023. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. UEFi64? You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi 6. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate (not with the certificate trusted by EFI DB). Also ZFS is really good. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. plist file using ProperTree. So thanks a ton, @steve6375! If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). There are many suggestion to use tools which make an ISO bootable with UEFI on a flash disk, however it's not that easy as you can only do that with UEFI-enabled ISO's. By UEFI enabled ISO's I mean that the ISO files contain a BOOT\EFI directory with a EFI bootloader. You can't. No bootfile found for UEFI! With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. and leave it up to the user. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. Still having issues? Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member 1. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. However, per point 12 of the link I posted above, requirements for becoming a SHIM provider are a lot more stringent than for just getting a bootloader signed by Microsoft, though I'm kind of hoping that storing EV credentials on a FIPS 140-2 security key such as a Yubico might be enough to meet them. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). Well occasionally send you account related emails. Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. Do I need a custom shim protocol? debes activar modo uefi en el bios It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. Sign in pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. Option 2 will be the default option. I thought that Secure Boot chain of trust is reused for TPM key sealing, but thinking about it more, that wouldn't really work. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. I've already disabled secure boot. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? Nierewa Junior Member. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. all give ERROR on my PC But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. So I apologise for that. It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO.